| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
61. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Aramendel Originally by: Nev Clavain It has no tank and a crow can beat its shield regen. While it has absoltuely nothing to hit back at a crow doing that speed. Its only option is to head for a gate or station. Now ...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.17 16:55:00
|
62. CCP... I need rl Alt!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Nev Clavain on 17/01/2007 16:00:39 Originally by: Phiberoptick Originally by: Nev Clavain COme and party on my discopoc, I have minmitar slave wenches. discopoc?! yo have a bpc for that one? me thinks me needs i...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.17 16:03:00
|
63. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jim McGregor Right... well, anyway, to fix the nanoships, they should start with the implants. Those are the ones responsible for every story people come on the forums with, where ships are orbiting at 5-8k per sec being un...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.17 16:00:00
|
64. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Aramendel Originally by: Nev Clavain Lol so your 300 mill setup you propose, (notice no hugely expesnive faction nos) can be countered by a crow setup worth under 100 mill, as I have already described. The problem is...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.17 15:59:00
|
65. CCP... I need rl Alt!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Rodj Blake Get the kids to mine for you? Genius :) COme and party on my discopoc, I have minmitar slave wenches.
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.17 15:52:00
|
66. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Nev Clavain on 17/01/2007 15:41:51 Originally by: Aramendel A decent faction MWD and 3 vent rigs are about 200 mil. 300 mil total with the other equipment perhaps if you incdule insurance payout. As ship prices go nanosetu...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.17 15:44:00
|
67. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Aramendel Edited by: Aramendel on 17/01/2007 15:19:39 Originally by: Nev Clavain A hugely specialised ship and pilot in their specific role OUGHT to be good at what they do. What is wrong with that. What kill...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.17 15:34:00
|
68. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Aramendel Edited by: Aramendel on 17/01/2007 15:19:39 Originally by: Nev Clavain A hugely specialised ship and pilot in their specific role OUGHT to be good at what they do. What is wrong with that. What kill...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.17 15:29:00
|
69. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Nev Clavain on 17/01/2007 15:19:43 Originally by: Xiaodown Your myth dispelling doesn't hold up. Originally by: Nev Clavain 2) OMG Nano BAttleships are invincible!!11 - No, No they aren't. Far from it. Anything t...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.17 15:21:00
|
70. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Wendat Huron So basically you need a Crow, rare compared to a Typhoon and a faction scrambler, again rare compared to a Typhoon to be able to counter a run off the mill Typhoon, sounds balanced to me... GRRRR, its not ...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.17 15:14:00
|
71. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hey I have a simple solution: Suck it up and stop whining. Lets start by dispelling a few myths: 1) Nano Battleships are faster than interceptors - No, No they aren't. They are faster than a badly setup interceptor with poor skills. Put that b...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.17 14:53:00
|
72. Question about Corp Wars. No Concord protection? Un-consented PvP?EH?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: DarkMatter Edited by: DarkMatter on 16/01/2007 14:38:03 Originally by: Nev Clavain Originally by: DarkMatter Originally by: Rodj Blake Originally by: RtoZ I got Irked with the possibility ...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.16 14:51:00
|
73. Question about Corp Wars. No Concord protection? Un-consented PvP?EH?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: RtoZ How I use my ships is my business, afaik. sure it is, and pvpers doing there thing is their business The reason threads like this get such a strong response is non-combatants are asking CCP to change the game in...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.16 14:42:00
|
74. Question about Corp Wars. No Concord protection? Un-consented PvP?EH?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: DarkMatter Originally by: Rodj Blake Originally by: RtoZ I got Irked with the possibility of being dragged into a non consentual corp war pvp situation which would eat my income and slow down my progress (I w...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.16 14:39:00
|
75. Question about Corp Wars. No Concord protection? Un-consented PvP?EH?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Nev Clavain on 16/01/2007 13:23:40 Originally by: BurnHard Originally by: Nev Clavain Originally by: BurnHard I think you should divide that growth by 2, because half of it consists of second, third, forth ...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.16 13:26:00
|
76. Question about Corp Wars. No Concord protection? Un-consented PvP?EH?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: BurnHard I think you should divide that growth by 2, because half of it consists of second, third, forth accounts and half of that other half are people coming in to farm it and sell their wares on e-bay. Plucking arb...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.16 12:23:00
|
77. Question about Corp Wars. No Concord protection? Un-consented PvP?EH?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gyvate Blacklight, Sorry pal, but I've got to give you a C minus in reading comprehension. Your paraphrase of what I said didn't quite cover it. Let me re-phrase. CCP has to protect their income stream by giving a lot of p...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.16 11:38:00
|
78. Question about Corp Wars. No Concord protection? Un-consented PvP?EH?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gyvate Blacklight, Sorry pal, but I've got to give you a C minus in reading comprehension. Your paraphrase of what I said didn't quite cover it. Let me re-phrase. CCP has to protect their income stream by giving a lot of p...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.16 11:38:00
|
79. Question about Corp Wars. No Concord protection? Un-consented PvP?EH?! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire War decs or empire wars should have been consensual PVP. Low secs for non-consensual and null secs for free for all. High secs wars are lame and bad for new players experience. What happened to the Jenny S...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.16 11:29:00
|
80. stealth bombers useage - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Stealth bombers are pretty decent, as long as you use the manticore that is :) The others dont really deal enough damage. We sometimes have a stealth bomber or two sitting around nearby a gatecamp, and i've seen plenty of inties get caught out, ...
- by Nev Clavain - at 2007.01.15 01:46:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |